Re: [PATCH] act_nat: the checksum of ICMP doesn't have pseudoheader

[Herbert Xu]

On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 10:16:05PM +0800, Changli Gao wrote:
> 
> I know we need to update the ICMP checksum if we alter the payload(the
> inner IP header here) of ICMP. But I doubt if the update is really
> necessary if the checksum is partial, as the   checksum will be done
> later(by ether skb_checksum_help() or NIC hardware). In fact, as there
> isn't any pseudo header, the icmph->checksum should be always ZERO,
> otherwise skb_checksum_help() or NIC will give the wrong checksums,
> when the checksum is partial.

Actually you are right.  I suppose the only reason this has never
shown up is because CHEKSUM_PARTIAL doesn't usually occur with
forwarded packets.

Acked-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Thanks,
-- 
Email: Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/