Re: [PATCH] Tight check of pfn_valid on sparsemem - v4

[Minchan Kim]

On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 12:02:16PM -0500, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> On Thu, 29 Jul 2010, Minchan Kim wrote:
> > invalid memmap pages will be freed by free_memmap and will be used
> > on any place. How do we make sure it has PG_reserved?
> 
> Not present memmap pages make pfn_valid fail already since there is no
> entry for the page table (vmemmap) or blocks are missing in the sparsemem
> tables.
> 
> > Maybe I don't understand your point.
> 
> I thought we are worrying about holes in the memmap blocks containing page
> structs. Some page structs point to valid pages and some are not. The
> invalid page structs need to be marked consistently to allow the check.

The thing is that memmap pages which contains struct page array on hole will be 
freed by free_memmap in ARM. Please loot at arch/arm/mm/init.c.
And it will be used by page allocator as free pages.

-- 
Kind regards,
Minchan Kim
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/