Re: [PATCH 1/4] timer: Added usleep[_range] timer

[Arjan van de Ven]

On 7/28/2010 2:23 PM, Andrew Morton wrote

, it would never have happened.

> > In that case, it would pus
> > h me in the direction of only providing
> > usleep_range, and thus forcing people to think about it that way;
> > leave slack decisions to people who know what tolerances are acceptable.
> >      
> Well, I _think_ that would be a good approach.  I'm 45%/55% on that one
> and would be interested in other opinions ;)
>
>    

for new interfaces I'd really like a "range only" option... make people 
think.
And passing in a 0 is easy.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/