Re: [Patch] kexec: increase max of kexec segments and use dynamicallocation

[Cong Wang]

On 07/26/10 20:19, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> Cong Wang<amwang@xxxxxxxxxx>  writes:
>
> > So, what is a better number? 2048? :)
>
> I was thinking something a little ridiculous like 10K or 64K.
>
> Assuming the usage you care about is something like hibernate on a
> machine with disjoint memory where you truly need one segment for
> each memory region.
>
> The only point of a limit at all once we introduce dynamic allocation
> is to catch buggy apps.

Ok, I will change that number and improve the changelog.

Thanks.


--
The opposite of love is not hate, it's indifference.
 - Elie Wiesel
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/