On Mon, 26 Jul 2010, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:On 07/26/2010 03:43 AM, Stefano Stabellini wrote:There isn't much point in doing so apart from avoiding an ifdef.On Mon, 26 Jul 2010, Stephen Rothwell wrote:Seems like the most sensible thing to do. What's the point in detectingHi all,The problem is that x86_hyper_xen_hvm is in arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c,
After merging the final tree, today's linux-next build (i386 defconfig)
failed like this:
arch/x86/built-in.o: In function `init_hypervisor_platform':
(.init.text+0x3ca4): undefined reference to `x86_hyper_xen_hvm'
arch/x86/built-in.o: In function `init_hypervisor_platform':
(.init.text+0x3cad): undefined reference to `x86_hyper_xen_hvm'
Caused by commit bee6ab53e652a414af20392899879b58cd80d033 ("x86: early PV
on HVM features initialization").
I reverted commit 4b9100d12d15c0eaf23d9edc86228e1bdf452dc2 ("Merge branch
'upstream/pvhvm' into upstream/xen") for today (since there were
dependencies on the above commit).
that is compiled only when CONFIG_XEN is enabled.
The appended patch fixes the issue moving x86_hyper_xen_hvm to
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/xen.c that is always compiled.
An shorter alternative solution would be just to ifdef CONFIG_XEN
x86_hyper_xen_hvm in arch/x86/kernel/cpu/hypervisor.c.
Xen if we don't have CONFIG_XEN enabled?
This is the alternative:
---
Signed-off-by: Stefano Stabellini<stefano.stabellini@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/hypervisor.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/hypervisor.c
index bffd47c..5bccedc 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/hypervisor.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/hypervisor.c
@@ -34,7 +34,9 @@ static const __initconst struct hypervisor_x86 * const hypervisors[] =
{
&x86_hyper_vmware,
&x86_hyper_ms_hyperv,
+#ifdef CONFIG_XEN
&x86_hyper_xen_hvm,
+#endif
};
const struct hypervisor_x86 *x86_hyper;