[PATCHv4 12/14] writeback: optimize periodic bdi thread wakeups

[Artem Bityutskiy]

From: Artem Bityutskiy <Artem.Bityutskiy@xxxxxxxxx>

Whe the first inode for a bdi is marked dirty, we wake up the bdi thread which
should take care of the periodic background write-out. However, the write-out
will actually start only 'dirty_writeback_interval' centisecs later, so we can
delay the wake-up.

This change was requested by Nick Piggin who pointed out that if we delay the
wake-up, we weed out 2 unnecessary contex switches, which matters because
'__mark_inode_dirty()' is a hot-path function.

This patch introduces a new function - 'bdi_wakeup_thread_delayed()', which
sets up a timer to wake-up the bdi thread and returns. So the wake-up is
delayed.

We also delete the timer in bdi threads just before writing-back.

This patch also moves the 'bdi_wb_init()' function down in the file to avoid
forward-declaration of 'bdi_wakeup_thread_delayed()'.

Signed-off-by: Artem Bityutskiy <Artem.Bityutskiy@xxxxxxxxx>
---
 fs/fs-writeback.c           |   28 +++++--------------
 include/linux/backing-dev.h |    2 +
 mm/backing-dev.c            |   64 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
 3 files changed, 61 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/fs-writeback.c b/fs/fs-writeback.c
index 6814502..b837cae 100644
--- a/fs/fs-writeback.c
+++ b/fs/fs-writeback.c
@@ -810,6 +810,12 @@ int bdi_writeback_thread(void *data)
 	trace_writeback_thread_start(bdi);
 
 	while (!kthread_should_stop()) {
+		/*
+		 * Remove own delayed wake-up timer, since we are already awake
+		 * and we'll take care of the preriodic write-back.
+		 */
+		del_timer(&wb->wakeup_timer);
+
 		pages_written = wb_do_writeback(wb, 0);
 
 		trace_writeback_pages_written(pages_written);
@@ -868,26 +874,6 @@ void wakeup_flusher_threads(long nr_pages)
 	rcu_read_unlock();
 }
 
-/*
- * This function is used when the first inode for this bdi is marked dirty. It
- * wakes-up the corresponding bdi thread which should then take care of the
- * periodic background write-out of dirty inodes.
- */
-static void wakeup_bdi_thread(struct backing_dev_info *bdi)
-{
-	spin_lock(&bdi->wb_lock);
-	if (bdi->wb.task)
-		wake_up_process(bdi->wb.task);
-	else
-		/*
-		 * When bdi tasks are inactive for long time, they are killed.
-		 * In this case we have to wake-up the forker thread which
-		 * should create and run the bdi thread.
-		 */
-		wake_up_process(default_backing_dev_info.wb.task);
-	spin_unlock(&bdi->wb_lock);
-}
-
 static noinline void block_dump___mark_inode_dirty(struct inode *inode)
 {
 	if (inode->i_ino || strcmp(inode->i_sb->s_id, "bdev")) {
@@ -1019,7 +1005,7 @@ out:
 	spin_unlock(&inode_lock);
 
 	if (wakeup_bdi)
-		wakeup_bdi_thread(bdi);
+		bdi_wakeup_thread_delayed(bdi);
 
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(__mark_inode_dirty);
diff --git a/include/linux/backing-dev.h b/include/linux/backing-dev.h
index 71b6223..7628219 100644
--- a/include/linux/backing-dev.h
+++ b/include/linux/backing-dev.h
@@ -52,6 +52,7 @@ struct bdi_writeback {
 	unsigned long last_active;	/* last time bdi thread was active */
 
 	struct task_struct *task;	/* writeback thread */
+	struct timer_list wakeup_timer; /* used for delayed bdi thread wakeup */
 	struct list_head b_dirty;	/* dirty inodes */
 	struct list_head b_io;		/* parked for writeback */
 	struct list_head b_more_io;	/* parked for more writeback */
@@ -105,6 +106,7 @@ void bdi_start_background_writeback(struct backing_dev_info *bdi);
 int bdi_writeback_thread(void *data);
 int bdi_has_dirty_io(struct backing_dev_info *bdi);
 void bdi_arm_supers_timer(void);
+void bdi_wakeup_thread_delayed(struct backing_dev_info *bdi);
 
 extern spinlock_t bdi_lock;
 extern struct list_head bdi_list;
diff --git a/mm/backing-dev.c b/mm/backing-dev.c
index b31c4f3..cedd9b1 100644
--- a/mm/backing-dev.c
+++ b/mm/backing-dev.c
@@ -248,17 +248,6 @@ static int __init default_bdi_init(void)
 }
 subsys_initcall(default_bdi_init);
 
-static void bdi_wb_init(struct bdi_writeback *wb, struct backing_dev_info *bdi)
-{
-	memset(wb, 0, sizeof(*wb));
-
-	wb->bdi = bdi;
-	wb->last_old_flush = jiffies;
-	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&wb->b_dirty);
-	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&wb->b_io);
-	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&wb->b_more_io);
-}
-
 int bdi_has_dirty_io(struct backing_dev_info *bdi)
 {
 	return wb_has_dirty_io(&bdi->wb);
@@ -316,6 +305,43 @@ static void sync_supers_timer_fn(unsigned long unused)
 	bdi_arm_supers_timer();
 }
 
+static void wakeup_timer_fn(unsigned long data)
+{
+	struct backing_dev_info *bdi = (struct backing_dev_info *)data;
+
+	spin_lock(&bdi->wb_lock);
+	if (bdi->wb.task) {
+		wake_up_process(bdi->wb.task);
+	} else {
+		/*
+		 * When bdi tasks are inactive for long time, they are killed.
+		 * In this case we have to wake-up the forker thread which
+		 * should create and run the bdi thread.
+		 */
+		wake_up_process(default_backing_dev_info.wb.task);
+	}
+	spin_unlock(&bdi->wb_lock);
+}
+
+/*
+ * This function is used when the first inode for this bdi is marked dirty. It
+ * wakes-up the corresponding bdi thread which should then take care of the
+ * periodic background write-out of dirty inodes. Since the write-out would
+ * starts only 'dirty_writeback_interval' centisecs from now anyway, we just
+ * set up a timer which wakes the bdi thread up later.
+ *
+ * Note, we wouldn't bother setting up the timer, but this function is on the
+ * fast-path (used by '__mark_inode_dirty()'), so we save few context switches
+ * by delaying the wake-up.
+ */
+void bdi_wakeup_thread_delayed(struct backing_dev_info *bdi)
+{
+	unsigned long timeout;
+
+	timeout = msecs_to_jiffies(dirty_writeback_interval * 10);
+	mod_timer(&bdi->wb.wakeup_timer, jiffies + timeout);
+}
+
 /*
  * Calculate the longest interval (jiffies) bdi threads are allowed to be
  * inactive.
@@ -349,8 +375,10 @@ static int bdi_forker_thread(void *ptr)
 		 * Temporary measure, we want to make sure we don't see
 		 * dirty data on the default backing_dev_info
 		 */
-		if (wb_has_dirty_io(me) || !list_empty(&me->bdi->work_list))
+		if (wb_has_dirty_io(me) || !list_empty(&me->bdi->work_list)) {
+			del_timer(&me->wakeup_timer);
 			wb_do_writeback(me, 0);
+		}
 
 		spin_lock_bh(&bdi_lock);
 		set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
@@ -598,6 +626,18 @@ void bdi_unregister(struct backing_dev_info *bdi)
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(bdi_unregister);
 
+static void bdi_wb_init(struct bdi_writeback *wb, struct backing_dev_info *bdi)
+{
+	memset(wb, 0, sizeof(*wb));
+
+	wb->bdi = bdi;
+	wb->last_old_flush = jiffies;
+	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&wb->b_dirty);
+	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&wb->b_io);
+	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&wb->b_more_io);
+	setup_timer(&wb->wakeup_timer, wakeup_timer_fn, (unsigned long)bdi);
+}
+
 int bdi_init(struct backing_dev_info *bdi)
 {
 	int i, err;
-- 
1.7.1.1

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/