Re: [RFC][PATCH 9/9] make kvm mmu shrinker more aggressive

[Avi Kivity]

On 06/22/2010 07:32 PM, Dave Hansen wrote:
> On Sun, 2010-06-20 at 11:11 +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
>    
> > > That changes a few things.  I bet all the contention we were seeing was
> > > just from nr_to_scan=0 calls and not from actual shrink operations.
> > > Perhaps we should just stop this set after patch 4.
> > >
> > >        
> > At the very least, we should re-measure things.
> >      
> Sure.  I'll go back to the folks that found this in the first place and
> see how these patches affect the contention we were seeing.
>    

Dave, how did those tests go?

--
I have a truly marvellous patch that fixes the bug which this
signature is too narrow to contain.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/