Re: swiotlb detection should be memory hotplug aware ?

[Alok Kataria]

On Tue, 2010-07-20 at 21:58 -0700, FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
> On Tue, 20 Jul 2010 15:14:57 -0700
> Alok Kataria <akataria@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > Reviving a 4 month old thread. 
> > I am still waiting for any clues on this question below. 
> 
> Basically, you want to add hot-plug memory and enable swiotlb, right?

Not really, I am planning to do something like this, 

@@ -52,7 +52,7 @@ int __init pci_swiotlb_detect(void)
 
 	/* don't initialize swiotlb if iommu=off (no_iommu=1) */
 #ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
-	if (!no_iommu && max_pfn > MAX_DMA32_PFN)
+	if (!no_iommu && (max_pfn > MAX_DMA32_PFN || hotplug_possible()))
 		swiotlb = 1;
 #endif
 	if (swiotlb_force)

BUT, I don't know how that hotplug_possible function will look like or
if such an interface already exists in the kernel (my search didn't turn
up any) ?

IMO, it should be possible to go read the SRAT to see if this system has
support for hotplug memory and then enable swiotlb if it does.

Sounds right ?

Thanks,
Alok

> 
> We can't start swiotlb reliably after a system starts.
> 
> See dma32_reserve_boatmen() and dma32_free_bootmem(). What we do is
> reserving huge memory in DMA32 zone for swiotlb and releasing it if we
> find that we don't need swiotlb. We can't find enough memory for
> swiotlb in dma32 after a system starts.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/