Re: [PATCH 0/2] cfq-iosched: fixing RQ_NOIDLE handling.

[Jeff Moyer]

Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 12:08:23PM -0400, Jeff Moyer wrote:
>> So, I'm still in favor of Corrado's approach.  Are there any remaining
>> dissenting opinions on this?
>
> Nope. I am fine with moving all WRITE_SYNC with RQ_NOIDLE to sync-noidle
> tree and also marking jbd writes as WRITE_SYNC. By bringing dependent
> threads on single service tree, we don't have to worry about slice
> yielding.
>
> Acked-by: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@xxxxxxxxxx>

Corrado, would you mind reposting the patches and adding:

Reviewed-by: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@xxxxxxxxxx>
Tested-by: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@xxxxxxxxxx>

Thanks!
Jeff
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/