Re: KVM timekeeping fixes, V2

[Zachary Amsden]

On 07/16/2010 03:19 AM, Joerg Roedel wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 04:25:20PM -1000, Zachary Amsden wrote:
>    
> > Discovered brammage in patches due to unresolved merge.
> > Also, had to move 09/18 past 08/18 to resolve compile issue.
> >      
> Have you tested this patchset with Nested SVM? We had TSC handling
> related bugs there in the past and should make sure to keep it working.
>    

I've been very careful to keep nested SVM safe, but I've not got a good 
test for that.  Is there any test suite for the nested case?

It took a lot of guessing to figure out why it works and why the code 
looks imbalanced, but I now understand the way it is now is logical and 
correct.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/