Re: [S+Q2 00/19] SLUB with queueing (V2) beats SLAB netperf TCP_RR

[Pekka Enberg]

David Rientjes wrote:
> On Fri, 9 Jul 2010, Christoph Lameter wrote:
>
> > The following patchset cleans some pieces up and then equips SLUB with
> > per cpu queues that work similar to SLABs queues.
>
> Pekka, I think patches 4-8 could be applied to your tree now, they're 
> relatively unchanged from what's been posted before.  (I didn't ack patch 
> 9 because I think it makes slab_lock() -> slab_unlock() matching more 
> difficult with little win, but I don't feel strongly about it.)

Yup, I applied 4-8. Thanks guys!

> I'd also consider patch 7 for 2.6.35-rc6 (and -stable).

It's an obvious bug fix but is it triggered in practice? Is there a 
bugzilla report for that?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/