Re: [PATCH 3/6] autofs/autofs4: move compat_ioctl handling into fs

[Ian Kent]

On Fri, 2010-07-16 at 02:14 +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> 2010/7/6 Ian Kent <raven@xxxxxxxxxx>:
> >
> >
> > On 06/07/2010, at 7:35 PM, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> Well, the only use of the BKL in autofs4 is in the ioctl function. You
> >> can probably replace that trivially with a global mutex, but from a quick
> >> inspection, even that should not be needed: The only ioctl command in
> >> autofs4 that does not already seem to have adequate locking is
> >> autofs4_get_set_timeout, which is even easier to change and still harmless
> >> if you don't do it at all.
> >
> > That's right of course.
> >
> > Even this shouldn't be a problem as it is called by a single instance, per autofs mount, of the daemon only. A fair amount of effort has gone into trying to make the autofs4 module independent of the BKL over time. However I would still rather not do the change concurrently with the ioctl changes.
> >
> > Ian
> 
> 
> In any case, can we let you handle this patch for 2.6.36 inclusion?

I think it makes more sense to keep these common patches together so
Arnd probably should keep it with his series.

Ian

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/