Re: [PATCHSET] workqueue: implement and use WQ_UNBOUND

[Tejun Heo]

Hello,

On 07/07/2010 07:41 AM, Tejun Heo wrote:
> On 07/02/2010 11:17 AM, Tejun Heo wrote:
>> Arjan, I still think we'll be better off using bound workqueues for
>> async but let's first convert without causing behavior difference.
>> Either way isn't gonna result in any noticeable difference anyway.  If
>> you're okay with the conversion, please ack it.
> 
> Ping, Arjan.

Just for the record, I pinged Arjan again offlist and Arjan acked the
conversion in the reply.  Added Acked-by and pushed the conversion to
for-next-candidate which will be pushed into linux-next the next week.

Thanks.

-- 
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/