Re: rt2x00: slow wifi with correct basic rate bitmap (was Re:stable? quality assurance?)

From: Alejandro Riveira FernÃndez
Date: Tue Jul 13 2010 - 14:15:11 EST


El Tue, 13 Jul 2010 14:50:14 +0200
Stefan Richter <stefanr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> escribiÃ:

> Alejandro Riveira FernÃndez wrote:
> > I for one stopped booting into -rc kernels.
> > The fact that still have to patch my kernels with a *one* liner
> > since 2.6.29 kernel [1] does not give me confidence on the "test
> > report/bisect and it will be fixed" promise some have made in this
> > threath
> >
> > [1] https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13362
>
> There were promises made in this thread? Then I must have read a
> different mailinglist or so.

Ok no promises.
Maybe I read to much in to Mr Tso previous mail. My apologies
[quote]
> So I tend to use -rc3, -rc4, and -rc5 kernels on my laptops, and when
> I find bugs, I report them and I help fix them. If more people did
> that, then the 2.6.X.0 releases would be more stable. But kernel
> development is a volunteer effort, so it's up to the volunteers to
> test and fix bugs during the rc4, -rc5 and -rc6 time frame.

[...]
> [...] Linux may be a very good bargain (look
> at how much Oracle has increased its support contracts for Solaris!),
> but it's still not a free lunch. At the end of the day, you get what
> you put into it.

I tested the kernels i reported the bugs and helped (to the best of my
knowledge; I'm not a programmer)
I got no result.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/