Re: questions about ttm_page_alloc.c

From: Jerome Glisse
Date: Mon Jul 12 2010 - 19:13:09 EST


On 07/12/2010 06:39 PM, Dan Carpenter wrote:
I'm investigating: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16337

He is using the new radeon with the new ttm pool wc/uc page allocator.
I'm sort of over my head when it comes to mm stuff so forgive me if
these are dumb questions... I'm looking at
drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_page_alloc.c.

230 static int set_pages_array_wc(struct page **pages, int addrinarray)
231 {
232 #ifdef TTM_HAS_AGP
233 int i;
234
235 for (i = 0; i< addrinarray; i++)
236 map_page_into_agp(pages[i]);
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

This actually sets the pages to uncached and not to write
cached. Is that deliberate?

237 #endif
238 return 0;
239 }

[snip]

327 pages_to_free[freed_pages++] = p;
328 /* We can only remove NUM_PAGES_TO_ALLOC at a time. */
329 if (freed_pages>= NUM_PAGES_TO_ALLOC) {
330 /* remove range of pages from the pool */
331 __list_del(p->lru.prev,&pool->list);

Why do we use p->lru.prev here when we use&p->lru in other
places?

332
333 ttm_pool_update_free_locked(pool, freed_pages);
334 /**
335 * Because changing page caching is costly
336 * we unlock the pool to prevent stalling.

regards,
dan carpenter
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

No it's fine, this code is for non x86 CPU, and on such platform
we assume wc == uncached and wb is normal (ie cached).

Cheers,
Jerome
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/