Re: nic enumeration

From: Steve Fink
Date: Mon Jul 12 2010 - 14:27:39 EST


>> I only partially understand your problem, but I am still wondering if
>> my bridge idea would work for you. (Preferably combined with udev
>> rules or whatever so the bridges are unnecessary after the next
>> reboot.)
>
> Why a bridge? Just to get around naming issues?

Yes. I wasn't claiming it was a *good* way to fix it. Just wondering
if it would work.

I have no idea whether it makes sense or not, not really knowing much
about this stuff myself. I tried it on my workstation. It's a good way
to kick yourself off the network. But it does work in the simplest
possible case, if you fix up routing afterwards. I don't know whether
bridges can be usefully used by VMs.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/