Re: [PATCH 0/5] Per superblock shrinkers V2

[Christoph Hellwig]

On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 12:41:04PM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:
> At this point in the cycle, I'd much prefer just to go with adding a
> context to the shrinker API to fix the XFS locking issues (i.e.  the
> original patches I sent) and spend a bit more time working out which
> combination of Nick's and my bits that improves reclaim speed whilst
> retaining the stability of the courrent code....

That approach sounds good to me.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/