Re: high power consumption in recent kernels

From: Peter Zijlstra
Date: Thu Jul 08 2010 - 08:23:16 EST


On Thu, 2010-07-08 at 21:04 +0900, Norbert Preining wrote:

> Just one more point, searching a bit more in the net I found the following
> patch (forgot who wrote it) which I merged into my current git:

> diff --git a/kernel/sched_fair.c b/kernel/sched_fair.c
> index a878b53..f26efba 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched_fair.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched_fair.c
> @@ -3248,6 +3248,9 @@ int select_nohz_load_balancer(int stop_tick)
> if (stop_tick) {
> cpu_rq(cpu)->in_nohz_recently = 1;
>
> + if (!mc_capable())
> + return 0;
> +
> if (!cpu_active(cpu)) {
> if (atomic_read(&nohz.load_balancer) != cpu)
> return 0;
> @@ -3297,6 +3300,9 @@ int select_nohz_load_balancer(int stop_tick)
> if (!cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, nohz.cpu_mask))
> return 0;
>
> + if (!mc_capable())
> + return 0;
> +
> cpumask_clear_cpu(cpu, nohz.cpu_mask);
>
> if (atomic_read(&nohz.load_balancer) == cpu)

Right, so that is a buggy patch, see the original discussion:
http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/4/26/249

> which looks better

The thing is, we didn't change that code recently, the patches that are
supposed to cure the nohz balancer are still pending (in -tip and
-next).

That said, we did frob something with the whole nohz thing, does the
below cure anything:

---
kernel/time/tick-sched.c | 2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/time/tick-sched.c b/kernel/time/tick-sched.c
index 813993b..9bc8029 100644
--- a/kernel/time/tick-sched.c
+++ b/kernel/time/tick-sched.c
@@ -325,7 +325,7 @@ void tick_nohz_stop_sched_tick(int inidle)
} while (read_seqretry(&xtime_lock, seq));

if (rcu_needs_cpu(cpu) || printk_needs_cpu(cpu) ||
- arch_needs_cpu(cpu) || nohz_ratelimit(cpu)) {
+ arch_needs_cpu(cpu) /* || nohz_ratelimit(cpu) */) {
next_jiffies = last_jiffies + 1;
delta_jiffies = 1;
} else {

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/