Re: [PATCH] avoid race condition in pick_next_task_fair in kernel/sched_fair.c

[Peter Zijlstra]

On Tue, 2010-06-29 at 19:24 +0800, shenghui wrote:

> I wonder is there any chance set_next_entity() can get NULL for
> parameter se if so?

Well, if your machine crashes that way, maybe, but I haven't seen that
happen in a long while.

> And will you please give me some instructions on where rq->lock
> is required?

Pretty much everywhere, if you look at sched.c the only sched_class
method not called with rq->lock held is ::task_fork().

The interesting bits are that schedule()->pre_schedule()/idle_balance()
can drop rq->lock as well as ->select_task_rq().



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/