Re: [PATCH v2 2/10] KVM: MMU: fix conflict access permissions indirect sp

[Avi Kivity]

On 06/25/2010 03:05 PM, Xiao Guangrong wrote:
> In no-direct mapping, we mark sp is 'direct' when we mapping the
> guest's larger page, but its access is encoded form upper page-struct
> entire not include the last mapping, it will cause access conflict.
>
> For example, have this mapping:
>          [W]
>        / PDE1 ->  |---|
>    P[W]          |   | LPA
>        \ PDE2 ->  |---|
>          [R]
>
> P have two children, PDE1 and PDE2, both PDE1 and PDE2 mapping the
> same lage page(LPA). The P's access is WR, PDE1's access is WR,
> PDE2's access is RO(just consider read-write permissions here)
>
> When guest access PDE1, we will create a direct sp for LPA, the sp's
> access is from P, is W, then we will mark the ptes is W in this sp.
>
> Then, guest access PDE2, we will find LPA's shadow page, is the same as
> PDE's, and mark the ptes is RO.
>
> So, if guest access PDE1, the incorrect #PF is occured.
>
> Fixed by encode the last mapping access into direct shadow page
>
> And, it also cleanup the code that directly get the last level's dirty flag
>
>    

Looks good, but please split the cleanup from the fix (we'll want to 
backport the fix but not the cleanup).

--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/