Re: [RFC] [PATCH] timer: Added usleep[_range][_interruptable] timer

[Andi Kleen]

Patrick Pannuto <ppannuto@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

Overall it seems like a good improvement.

> +
> +static inline void usleep(unsigned long usecs)
> +{
> +	usleep_range(usecs, usecs);
> +}
> +
> +static inline unsigned long usleep_interruptible(unsigned long usecs)

Is the interruptible case even needed?  I assume most drivers won't
bother with that and not being interruptible for a few usecs is not a
big issue.

-Andi

-- 
ak@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx -- Speaking for myself only.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/