Re: [RFC][PATCH] PM: Avoid losing wakeup events during suspend
From: Florian Mickler
Date: Tue Jun 22 2010 - 02:18:49 EST
On Mon, 21 Jun 2010 18:58:37 -0700
mark gross <640e9920@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> wrong. They are about 1) adding opportunistic suspend, and 2) adding
> critical sections to block suspend.
>
> No race issues where ever talked about until alternative solutions
> where put up.
The whole and only reason to even define the term "critical sections" is
when you need to define "a race". Or vice versa. A race is prevented by
defining critical sections and protecting these against concurrent
access.
[..snip..]
[some rant that alan is not familiar with android userspace..]
Are you suggesting that only android developers are supposed to talk
about this?
This is a pretty basic thing. It has only to do with system suspend.
(And using system suspend aggressively)
>
> --mgross
>
Cheers,
Flo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/