Re: [git pull] drm fixes

[Al Viro]

On Mon, Jun 07, 2010 at 11:00:51AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> So please. Just make me a tree that has regression fixes _only_. I'm not 
> AT ALL interested in "it is useful to report the gpu temp". If it was so 
> useful, and if it was ready before the merge window, it should hav gone in 
> then. That clearly wasn't the case, so it's not going in now either.

Ho-hum...  Speaking of which, what about leak fixes?  There's a long-standing
in-core inode leak in jffs2; basically, if you fail directory modification
in symlink() et.al., you get a leaked inode and whinge at umount.  Found
after -rc1, had been there since all the way back (similar bug in creat()
had been fixed in 2003, mkdir()/mknod()/symlink() were not).  Fix sits in
jffs2-fixes now...

I can simply pull jffs2-fixes into vfs for-next (I need it in there for
->evict_inode() series), but I'd obviously prefer to just rebase it after
it gets into mainline.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/