Re: [linux-pm] suspend blockers & Android integration

[Christoph Hellwig]

On Mon, Jun 07, 2010 at 12:26:55AM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> That takes a lot of the bullshit arguments about downstream users
> being hurt out of the discussion. The above problems are way more
> complex to resolve than the suspend blocker details.
> 
> That's another prove why we can let the drivers flow in (in the worst
> case w/o the suspend blocker stubs) and have no pressure to resolve
> the suspend blocker problem yesterday.
> 
> That said, after thinking more about it, I'm advocating the stubs
> solution with a clear removal / decision date constraint
> (e.g. 2.6.37), as it forces all involved parties to stay tuned and not
> to forget about it. I'm curious about the outcome :)

As long as we have that clear removal schedule I'm fine with in-kernel
suspend blocker stubs.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/