linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (tile treerelated)

From: Stephen Rothwell
Date: Mon Jun 07 2010 - 00:01:55 EST


Hi Chris,

After merging the final tree, today's linux-next build (sparc32 defconfig)
failed like this:

arch/sparc/kernel/sys_sparc_32.c:229: error: conflicting types for 'sys_rt_sigaction'
include/linux/syscalls.h:367: note: previous declaration of 'sys_rt_sigaction' was here

Caused by commit 5360bd776f73d0a7da571d72a09a03f237e99900 ("Fix up the
"generic" unistd.h ABI to be more useful") from the tile tree. Sparc's
sys_rt_sigaction has an extra argument.

I applied this patch for today. Something better could probably be
done. I note that there is already a declaration of sys_rt_sigaction in
include/asm-generic/syscalls.h ...

From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 7 Jun 2010 13:49:46 +1000
Subject: [PATCH] Only declare sys_rt_sigaction if it is wanted.

Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
include/linux/syscalls.h | 2 ++
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/syscalls.h b/include/linux/syscalls.h
index 61663cb..4193907 100644
--- a/include/linux/syscalls.h
+++ b/include/linux/syscalls.h
@@ -364,9 +364,11 @@ asmlinkage long sys_init_module(void __user *umod, unsigned long len,
asmlinkage long sys_delete_module(const char __user *name_user,
unsigned int flags);

+#ifdef __ARCH_WANT_SYS_RT_SIGACTION
asmlinkage long sys_rt_sigaction(int sig, const struct sigaction __user *act,
struct sigaction __user *oact,
size_t sigsetsize);
+#endif
asmlinkage long sys_rt_sigprocmask(int how, sigset_t __user *set,
sigset_t __user *oset, size_t sigsetsize);
asmlinkage long sys_rt_sigpending(sigset_t __user *set, size_t sigsetsize);
--
1.7.1

--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/