Re: [linux-pm] suspend blockers & Android integration

[Florian Mickler]

On Sun, 6 Jun 2010 12:00:47 +0200
Vitaly Wool <vitalywool@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Even worse, the suspend wakelock will keep the
> whole kernel active, as opposed to powering off unused devices
> separately as it's done in runtime PM. 

That is not true. While the kernel is not suspended it does
runtime pm.



> > Users do like that to work too -- I recall Arve leaving a device in
> > his filing cabinet with the radio off while he was out of the country
> > for three weeks once, and him discovering it was still running with
> > something like 25% battery remaining when he returned.
> 
> So what you're actually up to is that a user should restart the phone
> and turn the radio off if he wants to find it running when he's back
> from a long business trip or something. Nice...

?


Cheers,
Flo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/