Re: [PATCH] - race-free suspend. Was: Re: [linux-pm] [PATCH 0/8] Suspend block api (version 8)

[Brian Swetland]

On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 1:06 AM, Neil Brown <neilb@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Wed, 2 Jun 2010 00:05:14 -0700
> Arve HjÃnnevÃg <arve@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> > The user-space suspend daemon avoids losing wake-events by using
>> > fcntl(F_OWNER) to ensure it gets a signal whenever any important wake-event
>> > is ready to be read by user-space. ÂThis may involve:
>> > Â- the one daemon processing all wake events
>>
>> Wake up events are not all processed by one daemon.
>
> Not with your current user-space code, no. ÂAre you saying that you are not
> open to any significant change in the Android user-space code? ÂThat would
> make the situation a lot harder to resolve.

There are many wakeup events possible in a typical system --
keypresses or other input events, network traffic, telephony events,
media events (fill audio buffer, fill video decoder buffer, etc), and
I think requiring that all wakeup event processing bottleneck through
a single userspace process is non-optimal here.

The current suspend-blocker proposal already involves userspace
changes (it's different than our existing wakelock interface), and
we're certainly not opposed to any/all userspace changes on principle,
but on the other hand we're not interested in significant reworks of
userspace unless they actually improve the situation somehow.  I think
bottlenecking events through a central daemon would represent a step
backwards.

Brian
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/