Re: [PATCH] fs: run emergency remount on dedicated workqueue

[Tejun Heo]

Hello,

On 06/02/2010 01:57 AM, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Tue, 1 Jun 2010, Andrew Morton wrote:
>>
>> Please, always quote the patch title rather than a bare commit ID.  The
>> usual form is
>>
>>     fa4b9074cd8428958c2adf9dc0c831f46e27c193 ("buffer: make
>>     invalidate_bdev() drain all percpu LRU add caches:)
>>
>> The main reason for this is so that people can more reliably and simply
>> identify the patch within a different tree.  I think.
> 
> Absolutely. Also, I think it's usually more readable to quote just the 
> first 12 hex digits of the SHA1 - that's still going to be perfectly 
> unique in any practical situation, and makes it way easier to flow the 
> text to be readable.

Alright, will do so from now on.

>> gaah.  Do we really want to add Yet Another Kernel Thread just for that
>> dopey sysrq-U thing?
> 
> I do have to agree that it's disgusting. Can't we use an existing thread 
> (slow-work?) or something like that?

The dedicated workqueue can go away with cmwq.  As it's a temporary
measure until then, I wanted to keep it simple.  Would it be okay if I
note that the dedicated workqueue will go away soonish in the patch
description and comment?

Thanks.

-- 
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/