Re: [PATCH] mac8390: change an error return code and some cleanup,take 4

From: Finn Thain
Date: Mon May 31 2010 - 11:19:22 EST



On Mon, 31 May 2010, David Miller wrote:

> From: Joe Perches <joe@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Mon, 31 May 2010 08:08:13 -0700
>
> > There are many uses of KERN_DEBUG that are reasonable to have always
> > enabled.
>
> Doubtful.
>
> pr_debug() makes a ton of sense as currently implemented. It's for
> messages that we want both compile time and run-time control over.
>
> The case we have here in mac8390 seems like it should stay as pr_info().
> Because 1) it's already controlled by a run-time knob so controlling it
> even further is confusing and 2) the message is "informative", it lets
> the user know a feature cannot be enabled, thus pr_info().

If that is true in general, then ei_debug itself becomes questionable.

In the case of mac8390 at least, I'm certainly leaning toward changing the
pr_info (conditional on ei_debug) to pr_debug (unconditional).

Finn
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/