Re: [PATCH] cgroup: alloc_css_id() increments hierarchy depth

From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
Date: Sun May 30 2010 - 20:48:25 EST


On Sun, 30 May 2010 17:44:34 -0700
Greg Thelen <gthelen@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 4:54 PM, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
> <kamezawa.hiroyu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Mon, 31 May 2010 08:45:29 +0900
> > KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> >> On Fri, 28 May 2010 15:25:08 -0700
> >> Paul Menage <menage@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>
> >> > On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 8:16 AM, Greg Thelen <gthelen@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> > >
> >> > > Signed-off-by: Greg Thelen <gthelen@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >> >
> >> > Acked-by: Paul Menage <menage@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >> >
> >> > Good catch, thanks.
> >> >
> >> Nice Catch.
> >> Acked-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >>
> >> But, who breaks this ? Do we need backport this against old kernels ?
> >>
> > http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commitdiff;h=fae9c791703606636c1220e47f6690660042ce7f
> >
> > Hmm. this one. and 2.6.34 needs this patch. Greg, could you post this to
> > stable-2.6.34 tree ?
>
> Given that I forgot to include "Cc: stable <stable@xxxxxxxxxx>" in the
> patch, I assume the best way to get this patch into -stable is for me
> to email the commit id to stable@xxxxxxxxxx once the patch is accepted
> into Linus' tree. Let me know if there is a better way.
>

Yes, it's best to CC stable@xxxxxxxxxxx But please specify what version of
kernels requires this patch as "for 2.6.34"

Thank you,
-Kame

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/