Re: [linux-pm] [PATCH 0/8] Suspend block api (version 8)

[Nigel Cunningham]

Hi.

I like the sound of this much better too, but...

On 30/05/10 08:13, Arve Hjønnevåg wrote:
> On Sat, May 29, 2010 at 7:10 AM, Alan Stern<stern@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>  wrote:
> > There is no /sys/power/policy file.  In place of opportunistic suspend,
> > we have "QoS-based suspend".  This is initiated by userspace writing
> > "qos" to /sys/power/state, and it is very much like suspend-to-RAM.
>
> Why do you want to tie it to a specific state?

I do agree here. I would suggest that all /sys/power/state possibilities 
should have a qos- equivalent. You might not want to use any or all of 
them, but they should be available.

Regards,

Nigel



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/