Re: [linux-pm] [PATCH 0/8] Suspend block api (version 8)

[Alan Stern]

On Sat, 29 May 2010, Peter Zijlstra wrote:

> Correct, I strongly oppose using suspend. Not running runnable tasks is
> not a sane solution.
> 
> If current hardware can't cope, too friggin bad, get better hardware.

Taken out of context, this statement suggests you believe that
x86-based laptops should not be allowed to suspend automatically when
their lids are closed, and that everybody should replace their
x86-based laptops with something better.

Is that really what you mean?

Alan Stern

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/