Re: [linux-pm] [PATCH 0/8] Suspend block api (version 8)
From: Peter Zijlstra
Date: Fri May 28 2010 - 14:16:31 EST
On Fri, 2010-05-28 at 13:27 -0400, Zygo Blaxell wrote:
> From my reading of this thread, there's a lot of overlap between
> suspendblockers and constraints. Many use cases are served equally
> well with one or the other,
If using suspend-blockers,
Please explain to me how:
- I will avoid the cpu going into some idle state for which the wakeup
latency is larger than my RT app fancies?
- to avoid some tasks from being serviced by the filesystems whilst
others are? (ionice on steroids).
- does my sporadic task (with strict bandwidth budget) not suffer
bandwidth inversion?
suspend blockers do a bit of each of that, but none of it in a usable
fashion.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/