Re: [linux-pm] [PATCH 0/8] Suspend block api (version 8)

[Peter Zijlstra]

On Thu, 2010-05-27 at 16:33 +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
> On Thu, 27 May 2010 17:09:16 +0200
> Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > On Thu, 2010-05-27 at 11:06 -0400, Alan Stern wrote:
> > > 
> > >         Opportunistic suspends are okay.
> > > 
> > >         The proposed userspace API is too Android-specific.
> > 
> > I would argue opportunistic suspends are not ok, and therefore the
> > proposed API is utterly irrelevant.
> 
> Assuming you are happy that opportunistically entering C6 and the like is
> ok via ACPI can you explain why you have a problem with opportunistic
> suspend and why it is different to a very deep sleep CPU state such as we
> have now (and which on many embedded platforms we deal with *is* sleeping
> external devices too)

Agreed, but I understood the opportunistic suspend line from Alan Stern
to mean the echo opportunistic > /sys/power/foo thing.

If you view it as an extra deep idle state I have no problem with it
(because its simply an idle state, nothing magic about those).
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/