Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 04/11] Fix find_unbound_irq in presence ofioapic irqs.

From: Stefano Stabellini
Date: Thu May 27 2010 - 10:45:26 EST


On Wed, 26 May 2010, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 07:27:30PM +0100, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > Signed-off-by: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Can you provide a more detailed description of why this is needed?
>

We need it because we don't want to break the assumption that the first
16 irqs are ISA irqs, and among the other irqs we actually want to be
sure they are available before using them.


> > ---
> > drivers/xen/events.c | 11 ++++++++++-
> > 1 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/xen/events.c b/drivers/xen/events.c
> > index 8b68fc4..1356fa2 100644
> > --- a/drivers/xen/events.c
> > +++ b/drivers/xen/events.c
> > @@ -339,9 +339,18 @@ static int find_unbound_irq(void)
> > int irq;
> > struct irq_desc *desc;
> >
> > - for (irq = 0; irq < nr_irqs; irq++)
> > + for (irq = 0; irq < nr_irqs; irq++) {
> > + desc = irq_to_desc(irq);
> > + /* only 0->15 have init'd desc; handle irq > 16 */
> > + if (desc == NULL)
> > + break;
> > + if (desc->chip == &no_irq_chip)
> > + break;
> > + if (desc->chip != &xen_dynamic_chip)
> > + continue;
> > if (irq_info[irq].type == IRQT_UNBOUND)
> > break;
> > + }
> >
> > if (irq == nr_irqs)
> > panic("No available IRQ to bind to: increase nr_irqs!\n");
> > --
> > 1.5.4.3
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Xen-devel mailing list
> > Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/