Re: [PATCH 6/17] arch/x86/kernel: Add missing spin_unlock

[Nicolas Palix]

On Thursday 27 May 2010 13:17:58 Julia Lawall wrote:
> On Thu, 27 May 2010, Roedel, Joerg wrote:
> 
> > On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 11:55:59AM -0400, Julia Lawall wrote:
> > > The semantic match that finds this problem is as follows:
> > > (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/)
> > > 
> > > // <smpl>
> > > @@
> > > expression E1;
> > > @@
> > > 
> > > * spin_lock(E1,...);
> > >   <+... when != E1
> > >   if (...) {
> > >     ... when != E1
> > > *   return ...;
> > >   }
> > >   ...+>
> > > * spin_unlock(E1,...);
> > > // </smpl>
> > 
> > Btw, I think it would be great to have a collection of these semantic
> > match scripts in the kernel repository together with a build target to
> > run these scripts over the kernel sources (like the cscope target).
> > Opinions?
> 
> We have submitted and received some feedback on an initial version of 
> this, but I'm not completely sure of the current status.

You can see the latest feedback we get at
http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/5/10/257

The initial submission and its comments are at
http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/4/26/269

> 
> julia
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> 

-- 
Nicolas Palix
Tel: (+33) 1 44 27 87 25
Tel: (+33) 6 81 07 91 72
Web: http://www.diku.dk/~npalix/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/