Re: linux-next: build warning in Linus'tree

[Linus Torvalds]

On Wed, 26 May 2010, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
> 
> If my suggestion above works, then one could start transforming current uses of __BYTE_ORDER,
> into similar constructs and once all are done, #define both __LITTLE_ENDIAN/__BIG_ENDIAN and
> move back to #if __BYTE_ORDER == __LITTLE_ENDIAN

No. Don't do it. Why the hell would we want to use the inferior model?

		Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/