Re: [PATCH] virtio-blk: fix minimum number of S/G elements

From: Rusty Russell
Date: Wed May 26 2010 - 04:03:47 EST


On Tue, 25 May 2010 09:47:54 pm Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>
> We need at least one S/G element to operate properly, as does the block
> layer which increments it to one anyway. We hit this due to a qemu
> bug which advertises a sg_elements of 0 under some circumstances.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>

Seems reasonable: we might as well ignore it if device is obviously talking
crap.

However, the result is awkward (we assign err then don't use it), and assumes
that sg_elems isn't touched on error (true at the moment).

Prefer this:

Subject: virtio-blk: fix minimum number of S/G elements
Date: Tue, 25 May 2010 14:17:54 +0200
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>

We need at least one S/G element to operate properly, as does the block
layer which increments it to one anyway. We hit this due to a qemu
bug which advertises a sg_elements of 0 under some circumstances.

Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> (tweaked logic)

diff --git a/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c b/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c
--- a/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c
+++ b/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c
@@ -298,7 +298,9 @@ static int __devinit virtblk_probe(struc
err = virtio_config_val(vdev, VIRTIO_BLK_F_SEG_MAX,
offsetof(struct virtio_blk_config, seg_max),
&sg_elems);
- if (err)
+
+ /* We need at least one SG element, whatever they say. */
+ if (err || !sg_elems)
sg_elems = 1;

/* We need an extra sg elements at head and tail. */
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/