Re: [Patch 1/1] x86 efi: Fill all reserved memmap entries if add_efi_memmapspecified.

[H. Peter Anvin]

On 05/25/2010 03:34 PM, Mike Travis wrote:
> 
> 
> H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>> On 05/13/2010 02:55 PM, Mike Travis wrote:
>>> I saw that too, and wondered why e820_saved did not
>>> have the extra entries.   The comment indicates it
>>> should.
>>>
>>> I'm on the system tonight and will investigate this
>>> further.
>>>
>>
>> e820_saved lacks the extra entries because they aren't being passed in
>> from the bootloader, as they should, and instead you're using
>> add_efi_memmap which is, as far as the kernel is concerned, a post-boot
>> modification.
>>
>> That being said, add_efi_memmap does come from the firmware, and as such
>> it would be legitimate for it to add them to e820_saved.
>>
>> 	-hpa
> 
> Did this last patch meet expectations?
> 
> http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127474230623061&w=4
> 

I'm concerned about calling sanitize_e820_map() on e820_saved; it is
supposed to reflect the raw data as reported by the source, and
sanitizing it would corrupt that.

	-hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/