Re: [PATCH v3 06/11] rlimits: do security check under task_lock

From: Andrew Morton
Date: Thu May 13 2010 - 18:57:46 EST


On Mon, 10 May 2010 20:00:46 +0200
Jiri Slaby <jslaby@xxxxxxx> wrote:

> Do security_task_setrlimit under task_lock. Other tasks may
> change limits under our hands while we are checking limits
> inside the function. From now on, they can't.
>
> ...
>
> --- a/kernel/sys.c
> +++ b/kernel/sys.c
> @@ -1277,7 +1277,7 @@ int do_setrlimit(struct task_struct *tsk, unsigned int resource,
> struct rlimit *new_rlim)
> {
> struct rlimit *old_rlim;
> - int retval;
> + int retval = 0;
>
> if (resource >= RLIM_NLIMITS)
> return -EINVAL;
> @@ -1293,10 +1293,6 @@ int do_setrlimit(struct task_struct *tsk, unsigned int resource,
> goto out;
> }
>
> - retval = security_task_setrlimit(tsk, resource, new_rlim);
> - if (retval)
> - goto out;
> -
> if (resource == RLIMIT_CPU && new_rlim->rlim_cur == 0) {
> /*
> * The caller is asking for an immediate RLIMIT_CPU
> @@ -1309,11 +1305,13 @@ int do_setrlimit(struct task_struct *tsk, unsigned int resource,
>
> old_rlim = tsk->signal->rlim + resource;
> task_lock(tsk->group_leader);
> - if ((new_rlim->rlim_max <= old_rlim->rlim_max) ||
> - capable(CAP_SYS_RESOURCE))
> - *old_rlim = *new_rlim;
> - else
> + if ((new_rlim->rlim_max > old_rlim->rlim_max) &&
> + !capable(CAP_SYS_RESOURCE))
> retval = -EPERM;
> + if (!retval)
> + retval = security_task_setrlimit(tsk, resource, new_rlim);
> + if (!retval)
> + *old_rlim = *new_rlim;
> task_unlock(tsk->group_leader);
>
> if (retval || resource != RLIMIT_CPU)

Yikes, so the locking around all that selinux code becomes even more
brutal. How much rope are you tying around the selinux developers'
hands here?


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/