Re: [PATCH -V7 5/9] vfs: Add freadlink syscall

From: Neil Brown
Date: Thu May 13 2010 - 04:10:20 EST


On Thu, 13 May 2010 13:04:18 +0530
"Aneesh Kumar K. V" <aneesh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Thu, 13 May 2010 16:56:06 +1000, Neil Brown <neilb@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Thu, 13 May 2010 11:55:56 +0530
> > "Aneesh Kumar K. V" <aneesh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > > On Thu, 13 May 2010 11:43:51 +1000, Neil Brown <neilb@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > > On Wed, 12 May 2010 21:20:40 +0530
> > > > "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > This enables to use open-by-handle and then get the link target
> > > > > details of a symlink using the fd returned by handle
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > I find it very frustrating that a new syscall seems to be needed here.
> > > > We have 'readlinkat', and it should be enough.
> > > > How: the 'dfd' has to be a 'directory', and the path name as to be non-empty.
> > > >
> > > > The following patch allows 'path' to be NULL and in that case 'dfd' to be a
> > > > non-directory. This allows readlinkat and faccessat (and probably others)
> > > > to be used on an fd with not following path name.
> > > >
> > > > What do people think of this alternative?
> > > >
> > >
> > > I will add this in the next iteration and drop the freadlink syscall.
> > >
> >
> > I wouldn't be quite that hasty. It was only a proposal. It might not be
> > appropriate to change all those syscalls..
> >
> > An alternative that I don't think is a nice, but is a lot 'safer' is
> > to just change readlinkat to accept a NULL path:
>
> That would mean only readlinkat now have a special case of accepting NULL path
> and dirfd can point to objects other than directory. So from the
> interface point of having the special case is confusing. But if you feel
> strong enough to drop freadlink syscall i can do that. Just not sure
> whether special case for only readlinkat is the right way considering we
> have fstat/fchwon type calls for other file system operations.
>
>

Not completely a special case. I modelled this code on utimesat.

NeilBrown

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/