Re: [PATCH 2/4] tracing/sched: Fix task states in sched switch event

From: Ingo Molnar
Date: Thu May 13 2010 - 02:15:30 EST



* Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> +#define TASK_STATE_X(num) TASK_STATE_##num " (" DESCR_TASK_STATE_##num ")"
> static const char *task_state_array[] = {
> - "R (running)", /* 0 */
> - "S (sleeping)", /* 1 */
> - "D (disk sleep)", /* 2 */
> - "T (stopped)", /* 4 */
> - "t (tracing stop)", /* 8 */
> - "Z (zombie)", /* 16 */
> - "X (dead)", /* 32 */
> - "x (dead)", /* 64 */
> - "K (wakekill)", /* 128 */
> - "W (waking)", /* 256 */
> + TASK_STATE_X(0),
> + TASK_STATE_X(1),
> + TASK_STATE_X(2),
> + TASK_STATE_X(4),
> + TASK_STATE_X(8),
> + TASK_STATE_X(16),
> + TASK_STATE_X(32),
> + TASK_STATE_X(64),
> + TASK_STATE_X(128),
> + TASK_STATE_X(256)

Hm, this is totally unreadable. What does 'TASK_STATE_X' mean??

Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/