Re: [PATCH 02/12] rwsem: use single atomic update for sem count when waking up readers.

From: David Howells
Date: Wed May 12 2010 - 07:38:25 EST

Next message: David Howells: "Re: [PATCH 04/12] rwsem: consistently use adjustment variable"
Previous message: Mark Brown: "Re: [PATCH 0/8] Suspend block api (version 6)"
In reply to: Michel Lespinasse: "Re: [PATCH 02/12] rwsem: use single atomic update for sem count when waking up readers."
Next in thread: David Howells: "Re: [PATCH 04/12] rwsem: consistently use adjustment variable"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Michel Lespinasse <walken@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> + * write lock. However, we only only wake someone up

Can you get rid of the excess 'only' whilst you're at it?

David
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: David Howells: "Re: [PATCH 04/12] rwsem: consistently use adjustment variable"
Previous message: Mark Brown: "Re: [PATCH 0/8] Suspend block api (version 6)"
In reply to: Michel Lespinasse: "Re: [PATCH 02/12] rwsem: use single atomic update for sem count when waking up readers."
Next in thread: David Howells: "Re: [PATCH 04/12] rwsem: consistently use adjustment variable"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]