Re: [PATCH v21 015/100] cgroup freezer: Update stale locking comments

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

On Monday 10 May 2010, Matt Helsley wrote:
> On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 11:01:45PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Thursday 06 May 2010, Oren Laadan wrote:
> > > 
> > > On 05/06/2010 03:40 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > > On Saturday 01 May 2010, Oren Laadan wrote:
> > > >> From: Matt Helsley <matthltc@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > >>
> > > >> Update stale comments regarding locking order and add a little more detail
> > > >> so it's easier to follow the locking between the cgroup freezer and the
> > > >> power management freezer code.
> > > > 
> > > > I guess these three patches are for me.
> > > > 
> > > > Do you want me to handle them?
> > > 
> > > Yes, please, that would be great.
> > 
> > However, patches 16 and 17 seem to depend on checkpoint/restart and don't
> > appear to be margeable at this point.  Is this correct?
> 
> Strictly speaking they do not depend on checkpoint/restart. However, only
> checkpoint/restart uses the functionality introduced by those patches so I
> think you are correct that they aren't mergeable at this point.

OK, so I'm going to take patch 15 only for the upcoming merge window.

Thanks,
Rafael
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/