Re: [RFC][PATCH 2/9] perf: core, remove hw_perf_event_init

From: Frederic Weisbecker
Date: Mon May 10 2010 - 08:24:58 EST


On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 05:26:35PM +0800, Lin Ming wrote:
> A new field "pmu_id" is added to struct perf_event_attr.
>
> 2 new functions: perf_event_register_pmu, perf_event_lookup_pmu
> perf_event_register_pmu: the pmu registration facility
> perf_event_lookup_pmu: lookup the pmu via the passed in event->attr.pmu_id.
>
> A new api pmu->init_event to replace hw_perf_event_init
>
> Signed-off-by: Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> include/linux/perf_event.h | 9 +++++++++
> kernel/perf_event.c | 39 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
> 2 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/perf_event.h b/include/linux/perf_event.h
> index 5856d3b..6246c99 100644
> --- a/include/linux/perf_event.h
> +++ b/include/linux/perf_event.h
> @@ -225,6 +225,8 @@ struct perf_event_attr {
> __u32 bp_type;
> __u64 bp_addr;
> __u64 bp_len;
> +
> + int pmu_id;
> };
>
> /*
> @@ -553,6 +555,9 @@ struct perf_event;
> * struct pmu - generic performance monitoring unit
> */
> struct pmu {
> + int id;
> + struct list_head entry;
> +
> int (*enable) (struct perf_event *event);
> void (*disable) (struct perf_event *event);
> int (*start) (struct perf_event *event);
> @@ -569,6 +574,8 @@ struct pmu {
> void (*start_txn) (struct pmu *pmu);
> void (*cancel_txn) (struct pmu *pmu);
> int (*commit_txn) (struct pmu *pmu);
> +
> + int (*init_event) (struct perf_event *event);
> };
>
> /**
> @@ -1014,6 +1021,8 @@ extern int perf_swevent_get_recursion_context(void);
> extern void perf_swevent_put_recursion_context(int rctx);
> extern void perf_event_enable(struct perf_event *event);
> extern void perf_event_disable(struct perf_event *event);
> +
> +extern void perf_event_register_pmu(struct pmu *pmu);
> #else
> static inline void
> perf_event_task_sched_in(struct task_struct *task) { }
> diff --git a/kernel/perf_event.c b/kernel/perf_event.c
> index 36baf85..f19d40e 100644
> --- a/kernel/perf_event.c
> +++ b/kernel/perf_event.c
> @@ -40,6 +40,12 @@
> */
> static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct perf_cpu_context, perf_cpu_context);
>
> +/*
> + * The list of multiple hw pmus
> + */
> +static struct list_head pmus;
> +static int pmu_id_curr;
> +
> int perf_max_events __read_mostly = 1;
> static int perf_reserved_percpu __read_mostly;
> static int perf_overcommit __read_mostly = 1;
> @@ -75,11 +81,6 @@ static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(perf_resource_lock);
> /*
> * Architecture provided APIs - weak aliases:
> */
> -extern __weak struct pmu *hw_perf_event_init(struct perf_event *event)
> -{
> - return NULL;
> -}
> -
> void __weak hw_perf_disable(void) { barrier(); }
> void __weak hw_perf_enable(void) { barrier(); }
>
> @@ -4670,6 +4671,19 @@ static struct pmu *sw_perf_event_init(struct perf_event *event)
> return pmu;
> }
>
> +static struct pmu *perf_event_lookup_pmu(struct perf_event *event)
> +{
> + struct pmu *pmu;
> + int pmu_id = event->attr.pmu_id;
> +
> + list_for_each_entry(pmu, &pmus, entry) {
> + if (pmu->id == pmu_id)
> + return pmu;
> + }
> +
> + return NULL;
> +}
> +
> /*
> * Allocate and initialize a event structure
> */
> @@ -4685,7 +4699,7 @@ perf_event_alloc(struct perf_event_attr *attr,
> struct pmu *pmu;
> struct perf_event *event;
> struct hw_perf_event *hwc;
> - long err;
> + long err = 0;
>
> event = kzalloc(sizeof(*event), gfpflags);
> if (!event)
> @@ -4750,7 +4764,9 @@ perf_event_alloc(struct perf_event_attr *attr,
> case PERF_TYPE_RAW:
> case PERF_TYPE_HARDWARE:
> case PERF_TYPE_HW_CACHE:
> - pmu = hw_perf_event_init(event);
> + pmu = perf_event_lookup_pmu(event);
> + if (pmu && pmu->init_event)
> + err = pmu->init_event(event);



Having the same for software, tracepoints and breakpoints events would
be nice, so that we have a single simple path in perf_event_alloc
to initialize the event.

Thanks.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/