Re: [PATCH 0/3] ramzswap: Eliminate stale data from compressed memory(v2)

From: Pekka Enberg
Date: Sat May 08 2010 - 03:26:39 EST


Nitin Gupta wrote:
Oops, missed this part:

On 05/08/2010 11:59 AM, Pekka Enberg wrote:
Andrew Morton wrote:
I've completely forgotten why we need this xvmalloc thing and I don't
recall whether we decided it would be a good thing to have as a generic
facility and of course it's all unexplained and undocumented. I won't
be looking at it today, for this reason.
We need it because the slab allocator is not a good fit for this special
purpose driver due to fragmentation. Nitin, you had a nice web page
showing all the relevant numbers but I can't find it anymore.


xvmalloc performance numbers:
http://code.google.com/p/compcache/wiki/xvMalloc
http://code.google.com/p/compcache/wiki/xvMallocPerformance

I don't see the xvmalloc vs. kmalloc fragmentation numbers there. I thought you had some?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/