Re: Frontswap [PATCH 0/4] (was Transcendent Memory): overview

[Avi Kivity]

On 04/30/2010 04:45 AM, Dave Hansen wrote:
> A large portion of CMM2's gain came from the fact that you could take
> memory away from guests without _them_ doing any work.  If the system is
> experiencing a load spike, you increase load even more by making the
> guests swap.  If you can just take some of their memory away, you can
> smooth that spike out.  CMM2 and frontswap do that.  The guests
> explicitly give up page contents that the hypervisor does not have to
> first consult with the guest before discarding.
>    

Frontswap does not do this.  Once a page has been frontswapped, the host 
is committed to retaining it until the guest releases it.  It's really 
not very different from a synchronous swap device.

I think cleancache allows the hypervisor to drop pages without the 
guest's immediate knowledge, but I'm not sure.

--
I have a truly marvellous patch that fixes the bug which this
signature is too narrow to contain.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/