Re: [PATCH] procfs: fix tid fdinfo

From: Andrew Morton
Date: Fri Apr 23 2010 - 14:17:35 EST


On Fri, 23 Apr 2010 17:40:07 +0200
Jerome Marchand <jmarchan@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Correct the file_operations struct in fdinfo entry of tid_base_stuff[].
>
> Signed-off-by: Jerome Marchand <jmarchan@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> base.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/proc/base.c b/fs/proc/base.c
> index 7621db8..8418fcc 100644
> --- a/fs/proc/base.c
> +++ b/fs/proc/base.c
> @@ -2909,7 +2909,7 @@ out_no_task:
> */
> static const struct pid_entry tid_base_stuff[] = {
> DIR("fd", S_IRUSR|S_IXUSR, proc_fd_inode_operations, proc_fd_operations),
> - DIR("fdinfo", S_IRUSR|S_IXUSR, proc_fdinfo_inode_operations, proc_fd_operations),
> + DIR("fdinfo", S_IRUSR|S_IXUSR, proc_fdinfo_inode_operations, proc_fdinfo_operations),
> REG("environ", S_IRUSR, proc_environ_operations),
> INF("auxv", S_IRUSR, proc_pid_auxv),
> ONE("status", S_IRUGO, proc_pid_status),

hm, the code's been like that for over a year. What are the
user-visible effects of the bug, and of this change?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/