Re: [PATCH 0/5] Add second memory region for crash kernel

[H. Peter Anvin]

On 04/22/2010 03:07 PM, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> 
> Have you tried loading a 64bit vmlinux directly into a higher address
> range?  There may be a bit or two missing but you should be able to
> load a linux kernel above 4GB.  I tested the basics of that mechanism
> when I made the 64bit relocatable kernel.
> 
> I don't buy the argument that there is a direct connection between
> the amount of memory you have and how much memory it takes to dump it.
> Even an indirect connections seems suspicious.
> 

We actually have a 64-bit entry point even in bzImage; it is at offset
+0x200 from the 32-bit entry point.  Right now that offset is not
exported anywhere, but it has been stable for a very long time... at
least for as far back as the decompressor has been 64 bits.

The interface to the 64-bit code is by necessity wider, since there is
no such thing as paging off in 64-bit mode, but it probably isn't *too*
hard to figure out how page tables need to be set up in order to work
properly.  At that point, it would be good to document it.

	-hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/