[115/139] perf_events, x86: Implement Intel Westmere/Nehalem-EX support
From: Greg KH
Date: Thu Apr 22 2010 - 16:10:51 EST
2.6.33-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let us know.
------------------
From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@xxxxxxxxx>
original patch commit ids: 452a339a976e7f782c786eb3f73080401e2fa3a6 and
134fbadf028a5977a1b06b0253d3ee33e6f0c642
perf_events, x86: Implement Intel Westmere support
The new Intel documentation includes Westmere arch specific
event maps that are significantly different from the Nehalem
ones. Add support for this generation.
Found the CPUID model numbers on wikipedia.
Also ammend some Nehalem constraints, spotted those when looking
for the differences between Nehalem and Westmere.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Stephane Eranian <eranian@xxxxxxxxxx>
LKML-Reference: <20100127221122.151865645@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
perf, x86: Enable Nehalem-EX support
According to Intel Software Devel Manual Volume 3B, the
Nehalem-EX PMU is just like regular Nehalem (except for the
uncore support, which is completely different).
Signed-off-by: Vince Weaver <vweaver1@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@xxxxxxxxx>
LKML-Reference: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1004060956580.1417@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
Cc: Youquan Song <youquan.song@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
---
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c | 104 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
1 file changed, 103 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c
@@ -245,6 +245,97 @@ static u64 __read_mostly hw_cache_event_
[PERF_COUNT_HW_CACHE_OP_MAX]
[PERF_COUNT_HW_CACHE_RESULT_MAX];
+static const u64 westmere_hw_cache_event_ids
+ [PERF_COUNT_HW_CACHE_MAX]
+ [PERF_COUNT_HW_CACHE_OP_MAX]
+ [PERF_COUNT_HW_CACHE_RESULT_MAX] =
+{
+ [ C(L1D) ] = {
+ [ C(OP_READ) ] = {
+ [ C(RESULT_ACCESS) ] = 0x010b, /* MEM_INST_RETIRED.LOADS */
+ [ C(RESULT_MISS) ] = 0x0151, /* L1D.REPL */
+ },
+ [ C(OP_WRITE) ] = {
+ [ C(RESULT_ACCESS) ] = 0x020b, /* MEM_INST_RETURED.STORES */
+ [ C(RESULT_MISS) ] = 0x0251, /* L1D.M_REPL */
+ },
+ [ C(OP_PREFETCH) ] = {
+ [ C(RESULT_ACCESS) ] = 0x014e, /* L1D_PREFETCH.REQUESTS */
+ [ C(RESULT_MISS) ] = 0x024e, /* L1D_PREFETCH.MISS */
+ },
+ },
+ [ C(L1I ) ] = {
+ [ C(OP_READ) ] = {
+ [ C(RESULT_ACCESS) ] = 0x0380, /* L1I.READS */
+ [ C(RESULT_MISS) ] = 0x0280, /* L1I.MISSES */
+ },
+ [ C(OP_WRITE) ] = {
+ [ C(RESULT_ACCESS) ] = -1,
+ [ C(RESULT_MISS) ] = -1,
+ },
+ [ C(OP_PREFETCH) ] = {
+ [ C(RESULT_ACCESS) ] = 0x0,
+ [ C(RESULT_MISS) ] = 0x0,
+ },
+ },
+ [ C(LL ) ] = {
+ [ C(OP_READ) ] = {
+ [ C(RESULT_ACCESS) ] = 0x0324, /* L2_RQSTS.LOADS */
+ [ C(RESULT_MISS) ] = 0x0224, /* L2_RQSTS.LD_MISS */
+ },
+ [ C(OP_WRITE) ] = {
+ [ C(RESULT_ACCESS) ] = 0x0c24, /* L2_RQSTS.RFOS */
+ [ C(RESULT_MISS) ] = 0x0824, /* L2_RQSTS.RFO_MISS */
+ },
+ [ C(OP_PREFETCH) ] = {
+ [ C(RESULT_ACCESS) ] = 0x4f2e, /* LLC Reference */
+ [ C(RESULT_MISS) ] = 0x412e, /* LLC Misses */
+ },
+ },
+ [ C(DTLB) ] = {
+ [ C(OP_READ) ] = {
+ [ C(RESULT_ACCESS) ] = 0x010b, /* MEM_INST_RETIRED.LOADS */
+ [ C(RESULT_MISS) ] = 0x0108, /* DTLB_LOAD_MISSES.ANY */
+ },
+ [ C(OP_WRITE) ] = {
+ [ C(RESULT_ACCESS) ] = 0x020b, /* MEM_INST_RETURED.STORES */
+ [ C(RESULT_MISS) ] = 0x010c, /* MEM_STORE_RETIRED.DTLB_MISS */
+ },
+ [ C(OP_PREFETCH) ] = {
+ [ C(RESULT_ACCESS) ] = 0x0,
+ [ C(RESULT_MISS) ] = 0x0,
+ },
+ },
+ [ C(ITLB) ] = {
+ [ C(OP_READ) ] = {
+ [ C(RESULT_ACCESS) ] = 0x01c0, /* INST_RETIRED.ANY_P */
+ [ C(RESULT_MISS) ] = 0x0185, /* ITLB_MISSES.ANY */
+ },
+ [ C(OP_WRITE) ] = {
+ [ C(RESULT_ACCESS) ] = -1,
+ [ C(RESULT_MISS) ] = -1,
+ },
+ [ C(OP_PREFETCH) ] = {
+ [ C(RESULT_ACCESS) ] = -1,
+ [ C(RESULT_MISS) ] = -1,
+ },
+ },
+ [ C(BPU ) ] = {
+ [ C(OP_READ) ] = {
+ [ C(RESULT_ACCESS) ] = 0x00c4, /* BR_INST_RETIRED.ALL_BRANCHES */
+ [ C(RESULT_MISS) ] = 0x03e8, /* BPU_CLEARS.ANY */
+ },
+ [ C(OP_WRITE) ] = {
+ [ C(RESULT_ACCESS) ] = -1,
+ [ C(RESULT_MISS) ] = -1,
+ },
+ [ C(OP_PREFETCH) ] = {
+ [ C(RESULT_ACCESS) ] = -1,
+ [ C(RESULT_MISS) ] = -1,
+ },
+ },
+};
+
static __initconst u64 nehalem_hw_cache_event_ids
[PERF_COUNT_HW_CACHE_MAX]
[PERF_COUNT_HW_CACHE_OP_MAX]
@@ -2118,6 +2209,7 @@ static __init int intel_pmu_init(void)
* Install the hw-cache-events table:
*/
switch (boot_cpu_data.x86_model) {
+
case 15: /* original 65 nm celeron/pentium/core2/xeon, "Merom"/"Conroe" */
case 22: /* single-core 65 nm celeron/core2solo "Merom-L"/"Conroe-L" */
case 23: /* current 45 nm celeron/core2/xeon "Penryn"/"Wolfdale" */
@@ -2129,7 +2221,9 @@ static __init int intel_pmu_init(void)
event_constraints = intel_core_event_constraints;
break;
default:
- case 26:
+ case 26: /* 45 nm nehalem, "Bloomfield" */
+ case 30: /* 45 nm nehalem, "Lynnfield" */
+ case 46: /* 45 nm nehalem-ex, "Beckton" */
memcpy(hw_cache_event_ids, nehalem_hw_cache_event_ids,
sizeof(hw_cache_event_ids));
@@ -2142,6 +2236,14 @@ static __init int intel_pmu_init(void)
pr_cont("Atom events, ");
break;
+
+ case 37: /* 32 nm nehalem, "Clarkdale" */
+ case 44: /* 32 nm nehalem, "Gulftown" */
+ memcpy(hw_cache_event_ids, westmere_hw_cache_event_ids,
+ sizeof(hw_cache_event_ids));
+
+ pr_cont("Westmere events, ");
+ break;
}
return 0;
}
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/